Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Rockets "Go Boom" Too Much?

On June 21, 2006, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission issued recall #06-191 for the "Thunderstick Rocket" fireworks. They were overloaded with flash powder and could explode with a greater force than expected, injuring nearby consumers.

They are rockets. The whole point of them is to launch them into the air, where there are no "nearby consumers." That probably explains why, out of 61,200 packages of six rockets sold, no injuries had been reported.

Sorry to have disappeared for awhile. I hope to be back on schedule with this blog now, posting 2-3 times per week.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Leave Your Neighbor's Horn Alone

In University City, Missouri, Section 10.32.100 of the Municipal Code prohibits honking the horn of another person's car without permission. (Yes, it actually says you may not "sound the horn.")

Monday, June 27, 2011

A Bit Overbroad?

Sometimes good intentions do not cover up the fact that statutes can cover just about anything under the sun. Take Tennessee's harassment statute, 39-17-308, for example. It protects people from being threatened or harassed, and House Bill 300 (2011) made some amendments so that the law applies to social networks, among other changes. Great, right?

Here's the effect of some of the language. "A person commits an offense who intentionally . . . communicates with another person by [telephone, in writing, or electronically] without legitimate purpose, with the malicious intent to frighten [and] as a result . . . the person is frightened."

So you post a picture on YouTube calculated to scare people - just for the heck of it, since you like to scare people. Sounds like you have committed a crime if someone in Tennessee sees the image and gets scared! They wanted to cover all their bases, but they managed to cover a few more bases than they had planned.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Skunk Farms?

Section 75-40-1 of the Mississippi Code prohibits the importation of live skunks for sale. Fear not, because it does not apply to the sale of live skunks to persons outside the state by a skunk farmer approved by the USDA. Honestly, I am not aware of any skunk farms in Mississippi. How bad would a skunk farm smell, anyway?

Monday, June 6, 2011

Don't listen to your MP3 player in a Hampton dance hall!

In Hampton, Virginia, Section 4-22 prohibits public dance halls from being open from 2:00 a.m. until 9:00 a.m., 7 days a week. Not only that, but it is unlawful to play any music in a public dance hall during those hours. It applies to live music and any music "by mechanical devices of any nature." So if you sit in a public dance hall after 2:00 a.m. listening to your MP3 player, you are committing an unlawful act, so beware!

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Bikes Through a Parking Lot Prohibited!

Section 16-4 of the Mayfield, Kentucky Code of Ordinances prohibits driving a bicycle through the parking lot of a business, except for business purposes. So no cut throughs for those delinquent bicyclists.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

So what exactly does this mean?

According to § 314 of Title 9, Chapter 8 of the California Penal Code, it is a misdemeanor to wilfully and lewdly assist a person in making an exhibition of himself, adapted to excite to vicious thoughts or acts. It's considered obscene. Anyone have a guess as to what this actually prohibits?

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Protect the Flag!!

According to the Illinois Flag Desecration Act (§ 720 ILCS 620/1), it is a misdemeanor in Illinois to have an American flag printed on a shopping bag as a decoration.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Dancing in North Carolina

The Ahoskie, North Carolina Municipal Code (Secs 34-211 et seq) provides that anyone who wants to hold a dance must have a permit. All dances must end by midnight, Saturday night. No permit will be issued for a dance on Sunday, unless New Year's Eve falls on a Sunday. (New Year's Eve dances may end at 1:00 a.m. on Sunday.)

Not only that, but unless the dance is held by "any bona fide civic, patriotic or fraternal club, church, private or public school or any other charitable organization," the permit fee has to pay for three police officers to supervise the dance! Interesting that dancing on Sunday is bad, but a church-sponsored dance is okay.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Novelty Lighters

Want a gigarette lighter shaped like a pistol, or an animal, or with a flashing light on it? New ones are no longer available for sale in Mississippi. According to Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 45-10-3, "A person may not sell at retail, offer for retail sale or distribute for retail sale or promotion in this state a novelty lighter."

So what is this offensive "novelty lighter?" It's a lighter "that is designed to resemble a cartoon character, toy, gun, watch, musical instrument, vehicle, animal, food or beverage, or similar articles, or that plays musical notes, or has flashing lights for entertainment or has other entertaining features." (Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 45-10-1) Antiques are okay, since ones produced prior to 1980 are excluded.

Aren't we glad that government protects us from such evils as cigarette lighters that play music?

Monday, March 28, 2011

The Guano Islands Act

The Guano Islands Act (48 U.S.C. ch.8 §§ 1411-1419), passed in 1856, was federal legislation intended to ensure a steady supply of crap for America. The first section of this Act states,

"Whenever any citizen of the United States discovers a deposit of guano on any island, rock, or key, not within the lawful jurisdiction of any other Government, and not occupied by the citizens of any other Government, and takes peaceable possession thereof, and occupies the same, such island, rock, or key may, at the discretion of the President, be considered as appertaining to the United States."

My guess is that Congress generates a sufficient quantity of guano these days for this law to be unnecessary.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

From the Department of Repetitive Redundancies Department

Henderson, Kentucky, appears to REALLY want to protect their birds. Here are two related ordinances:

"Sec. 6-3. Pursuing, injuring, killing of animals and birds.
No person shall shoot at, kill, or otherwise pursue, kill, or injure any squirrel, rabbit or other game, or any songbird, or other bird, or fowl within the limits of the city.
(Code 1968, § 90.05)

Sec. 6-4. Use of birds and fowl as live targets.
No person shall keep or use any live pigeon, fowl or other bird for the purpose of a target, or to be shot at, or as a test of marksmanship, or shoot at any bird or fowl kept or used as beforesaid, or be a party to any such shooting, or knowingly rent any building, shed, room, yard, field or premises or knowingly permit the use of any building, yard, shed, room, field or premises for the purpose of such shooting.
(Code 1968, § 90.06)"

Maybe I miscounted, but I think that was EIGHT times they said "don't shoot at a bird."

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Public Toileting

Okay, here's one from Dallas, Texas, that is perfectly legitimate and sensible, but can be twisted every way imagineable:

"31-18. URINATING OR DEFECATING IN PUBLIC.
(a) A person commits an offense if he urinates or defecates:
(1) in or on a public street, alley, sidewalk, yard, park, building,
structure, plaza, public or utility right-of-way, or other public place; or
(2) in public view.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under this section if the person was in a restroom. (Ord. 14971)"

So if you are waiting in line at the DMV and wet your pants, aside from being embarassed, you have committed a crime? And if you stand in front of your bathroom window to toilet, it's okay, since you are in a restroom? I'll leave more twisting to your imagination.

Monday, March 14, 2011

And This Extra is Needed Why?

In Preston, Idaho, "It is unlawful for any person to wrongfully harvest or otherwise take the beans, cabbage, corn, peas or other crops of another within the city limits of the city." (Code Section 9.54.010 )

So they passed an ordinance making stealing crops a crime? Were the state laws against stealing not good enough for them?

Monday, March 7, 2011

Walk Across Bridges

Mississippi has an old law (Miss. Code Ann § 65-7-41) that "It shall not be lawful for any person to drive a wagon, carriage, or other vehicle of any description drawn by animal power or to ride, leap, or drive any horse, mule, or any description of cattle over or upon any bridge erected in any county by authority of the board of supervisors or in a city, town, or village at a faster gait than a walk; and every person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, on conviction, fined five dollars."

I doubt that anyone gets fined for this these days, since the statute goes on to say, "But the board of supervisors or municipal authorities shall cause to be fixed up and kept at each end of the bridge, in some conspicuous place, a board on which shall be painted in large letters, 'five dollars fine for riding or driving any animal over this bridge at a faster gait than a walk'; and on neglect of such notice, such fine shall not be incurred."

After many years in this state I have yet to see such a sign "fixed up and kept" on any bridges.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Untended Animals in Massachusetts

Some laws are obviously old and obsolete, and should just be presented in their entirety. Massachusetts General Law § 49:24 is one of these:

"Every field driver shall take up horses, mules, asses, neat cattle, sheep, goats or swine going at large in the public ways, or on common and unimproved land within his town and not under the care of a keeper; and any other inhabitant of the town may take up such cattle or beasts so going at large on Sunday, and for taking up such beasts on said day the field driver or such other inhabitant of the town may in tort recover for each beast the same fees which the field driver is entitled to receive for taking up like beasts."

So the "field driver" can get a fee for taking up certain untended animals roaming at large in town. Private citizens may do so, but only on Sundays. So was Sunday the field driver's day off?

Monday, February 28, 2011

Herding Animals in Texas

Abilene, Texas, a city famous for its old time cattle drives, stopped the drives in 1965. City ordinance section 6-12, passed in 1965, provides that "The driving of herds of animals, other than dogs, cats or other domesticated pets, along or upon any street, avenue or alley of the city is hereby prohibited."

I would like to see someone driving a herd of cats through Abilene, or any other city, for that matter.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Serious About Roller Skating

Ansonia, Connecticut, is serious about regulating roller skating.

Under Section 22-1 of the Municipal Code of Ordinances, public roller skating rinks may ONLY be on the first floor of a building. Section 22-2 states that the chief of police may allow a licensed rink to be on another floor, however.

Section 22-8 requires a policeman to be on duty in a licensed roller skating rink. They must be rowdier than skating rinks I've seen.

Section 22-9 specifies the type of skates that may be used. I wonder if you would be ejected if you bring your own skates and they don't meet specs.

Finally, Section 22-10 requires a weekly fire drill.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

And This is Needed Why?

Ada, Oklahoma requires anyone cleaning a sanitary sewer in the city to file a bond with the city. (Sec. 42-501. Sewer cleaner's bond)

Friday, February 18, 2011

Define "Buttocks"

Define the word "buttocks." Webster's defines "buttock" as "1. the back of a hip that forms one of the fleshy parts on which a person sits; 2. the seat of the body." Simple enough, right?

Quincy, Florida, has ordinances relating to how much of a person's body may be exposed without being considered unlawful or nudity, which is not unusual. Quincy also has a section of their code that defines "buttocks," and it is worth quoting, if only to show how much time someone spent on this . . .

"(c) Buttocks. (For a short general description see the last sentence of this subsection.) The area at the rear of the human body (sometimes referred to as the gluteus maximus) which lies between two imaginary straight lines running parallel to the ground when a person is standing, the first or top of such line being one half inch below the top of the vertical cleavage of the nates (i/e., the prominence formed by the muscles running from the back of the hip to the back of the leg) and the second or bottom such line being one half inch above the lowest point of the curvature of the fleshy protuberance (sometimes referred to as the gluteal fold), and between two imaginary straight lines, one on each side of the body (the "outside lines"), which outside lines are perpendicular to the ground and to the horizontal lines described above and which perpendicular outside lines pass through the outermost point(s) at which each nate meets the outer side of each leg. Notwithstanding the above, buttocks shall not include the leg, the hamstring muscle below the gluteal fold, the tensor fasciae latae muscle or any of the above-described portion of the human body that is between either (i) the left inside perpendicular line and the left outside perpendicular line or (ii) the right inside perpendicular line and the right outside perpendicular line. For the purpose of the previous sentence the left outside perpendicular line shall be an imaginary straight line on the left side of the anus (i) that is perpendicular to the ground and to the horizontal lines described above and (ii) that is one third of the distance from the anus to the left outside line, and the right inside perpendicular line shall be an imaginary straight line on the right side of the anus (i) that is perpendicular to the ground and to the horizontal lines described above and (ii) that is one third of the distance from the anus to the right outside line. (The above description can generally be described as covering one third of the buttocks centered over the cleavage for the length of the cleavage.)

Code 50-38(c)"

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Sexually Oriented Barbers?

Bullhead City, Arizona, has an ordinance requiring a license for a sexually-oriented business. Nice and normal, right? Section 5.17.040 of their municipal code lists exceptions, one of which baffles me: "Barbers and beauticians who are duly licensed under the laws of the state."

Since when is barbering a sexually-oriented business?

Monday, February 14, 2011

Selling Dog or Cat Fur?

What kind of society do we have now that makes a law like this one necessary? In Oregon, Ore. Stat. § 167.390 prohibits commerce in fur of domestic dogs and cats, but only if "the fur is obtained through a process that kills or maims the cat or dog."

So if you really want that coat made from cat hair, you either have to wait for the cat to shed enough or shave enough cats to make your coat. I wonder if this law has created a black market in dog or cat fur. Does Oregon ever arrest people for selling a dime bag of calico fur, or a brick of lhasa apso fur?

This section also prohibits bartering such fur, so you can't trade two siamese pelts for a Maine coon pelt, for example. Again, why would we need such a law?

Friday, February 11, 2011

Burial Sites?

In Bluefield, West Virginia, Ordinance Sec. 22-39 regulates where a body may be buried in the town cemetery. It does not set off spaces or a grid or anything like that, though. The ordinance states, "No person shall bury or cause to be buried any body in any of the avenues, roads, alleys or unsurveyed spaces within the cemetery or bury or cause to be buried any body in any lot in the cemetery of which he is not the owner or for which he shall not have the consent of the owner."

So, you are not allowed to bury someone IN THE ROAD in the town cemetery. Did they have a problem with people being buried IN THE ROAD? Or is the road so bumpy that people wondered????

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Police Slingshots?

In Quincy, Florida, Ordinance Sec. 50-3 states, "It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any firearm, including a pistol, rifle or shotgun or to use any slingshot, air gun or air rifle within the city, except peace officers in the line of duty.
(Code 1958, § 10-42)"

Crime must not exactly be rampant in Quincy if law enforcement carries slingshots. I wonder if the Quincy PD has an official slingshot round?

Monday, February 7, 2011

No Peanut Shells on the Floor

In Devils Lake, North Dakota, it is unlawful to throw nut hulls on the floor in a public theater (Code Sec. 9.24.020). Popcorn is apparently okay to throw on the floor, but "nuts or nut shells," and "fruit, fruit parings or skins" are specifically forbidden, so my guess is that the theater or theaters in Devils Lake do not sell peanuts.

Friday, January 28, 2011

No Sleeping on Streets, but Only at Night

In Ada, Oklahoma, an ordinance (Code 1985, § 10-411) forbids sleeping on the street, but only from midnight to sunrise. I presume it is not a problem in Ada for people to sleep on the street during the day or evening? Just after midnight?

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Don't Sit in a Doorway

In Winnemucca, Nevada, an ordinance prohibits sitting in a doorway if there is a sign posted that prohibits sitting in the doorway. (9.12.040)

Think there's much of a market (outside of Winnemucca) for signs that say, "No Sitting in Doorway?"

Monday, January 24, 2011

Crows are Farm Animals?

In Quincy, Florida, you are not allowed to keep farm animals within the city limits. (Code of Ordinances Section 10-6(c)) Makes sense, right? In Section 10-1 they define "farm animal" as "any animal commonly used for agricultural purposes, including, but not limited to pigs, sheep, goats, horses, crows, roosters, ducks or other fowl, and cow, bull, or steer."

Since when is a crow used for agricultural purposes? I haven't met the farmer yet who thought of crows as anything other than a pest to be driven off or killed.

Remember "mystery meat" from grade school? That may not be a good choice in the Quincy schools, if crow is a farm animal!

Friday, January 21, 2011

Do Not Molest Your Neighbor's Dog

According to the Town of Ahoskie, NC, Code of Ordinances: "Sec. 10-22. Teasing, molesting or baiting.
It shall be unlawful for any person within the corporate limits of the town to tease, molest or bait any dog not belonging to such person or legally under the control of such person.
(Code 1976, § 4-4)"

So teasing, molesting, or baiting your own dog is fine, just don't do it to someone else's dog? Webster's 9th Collegiate dictionary defines "bait" as "to harass (as a chained animal) with dogs usually for sport." And this is okay, as long as you use your own dogs?

Friday, January 14, 2011

Do Not Feed the Wildlife

In Magnolia, New Jersey, according to Ord. No. 2005-10, § 3, 7-21-2005, you are not allowed to feed wildlife in a park or any other proprty owned by the borough. So it is forbidden to sit in the park and feed the birds, or toss peanuts to the squirrels.

Why? According to the ordinance, it is "so as to protect public health, safety and welfare." Got to watch out for those squirrels, you know. When they get used to being fed, they get to where they might pull a knife on you and steal your peanuts.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Dog Census

With certain exceptions for certain towns, Rhode Island law (§ 4-13-11) requires an annual census of dogs by each town. Every Spring, each town sergeant is to compile a list of licensed dogs and a list of unlicensed dogs, with the names of the owners, swear to each, and post both lists in three public places.

I wonder how they prepare a list of unlicensed dogs. Maybe they have some tips they could pass along to the US Census Bureau.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Don't Advertise Alcohol Content

In Indiana, "It is unlawful for a person to advertise the proof or the amount or percentage of alcohol in beer or wine." (Ind. Stat. § 7.1-5-2-2)

So if your beer or wine is so loaded with alcohol that a sip would stagger a horse, you can't advertise the fact. I guess "they" want to protect the public from peopple advertising their beer or wine as strong stuff. By the same token, though, does this mean that low-alcohol beers cannot advertise as such in Indiana?

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Stealing Crops

In Preston, Idaho, an ordinance states: "9.54.010 - Unlawful acts.
It is unlawful for any person to wrongfully harvest or otherwise take the beans, cabbage, corn, peas or other crops of another within the city limits of the city. (Ord. 441 § 1, 1978)."

Are the laws against stealing not good enough for them? Does Preston have so much farmland IN THE CITY LIMITS that this additional protection is needed?????